- Bachelor
- Applied Polymer Technology
- Applied Business and Media Psychology
- Business administration
- Biomedical Engineering
- Data Protection and IT Security
- Industrial Biotechnology
- Intercultural Management
- International Management (top athletes)
- Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Systems
- Multimedia and Communication
- Sustainable Engineering
- Production Management for Film and TV
- Departmental journalism
- Strategic Management
- Visualization and Interaction in Digital Media
- Value Creation Management
- Business Informatics
- Engineering and Management
- Cooperative study options
- Preparatory course for Mathematics of the Faculty of Technology
- Language center
- Master
- Use of an electronic questionnaire with tested and event-typical survey instruments in the context of teaching evaluations
- Maintaining anonymity due to the legal provisions on data protection
- Transparency of the results in compliance with data protection regulations
Accreditation and evaluation
Evaluation
Through the evaluation procedures, we can continuously create the best possible conditions and incentives for studying and teaching as well as for the employees of the study-related facilities. The evaluations are based on the quality of our high standards and can therefore lead to the implementation of new and optimized teaching, learning and working environments
Your opinion is important to us!
We are very pleased that students are making an important contribution to systematic quality assurance and improvement in teaching and studies through their voluntary participation in the surveys. Standardized evaluation procedures have become an essential part of (re-)accreditation procedures. For example, we carry out teaching evaluations and degree program surveys in electronic form via smartphone, tablet or notebook on site during courses.
In order to achieve the best possible implementation of the results of surveys, valid data is an essential prerequisite and ultimately depends on a high level of participation and sincere evaluation by the respondents.
A high level of participation in the surveys requires a high level of acceptance. This should be achieved under the following conditions in particular:
The “Evaluation” working group, consisting of the Vice President (responsible for studies and teaching), the deans of studies of the faculties, two members of the student council and the coordinator for evaluation procedures, regularly deals with the optimization of the individual evaluation procedures and, in doing so, takes into account the following aspects in particular
© 2024 Hochschule Ansbach
